Zeepay pic

DRIVING DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION: OVERVIEW ON ZAMBIA’S NATIONAL PAYMENT SYSTEMS

Author: Aston Njovu

Products Manager – ZeePay

The year 2024 marked a period of robust growth and transformation for Zambia’s National Payment Systems (NPS). Driven by policy reforms, technological advancements, and evolving consumer preferences, the NPS achieved significant milestones in transaction processing, system modernization, and regulatory oversight. Without wasting time, let’s dive into the excitement.

Mobile Money and Financial Inclusion keeps surging at an interesting pace. This is mainly monitored through metrices such as the rise in digital assets and patronage.

  • -In 2024 Mobile Subscribers rose slightly to 19,604,415 from 19,477,324 in 2023
  • -There was a reduction in Registered Mobile Money Wallets to 14,650,368 from 17,290,646 in 2023, this was mainly due to the cleanup of dormant and irregular accounts as a fraud mitigation measure.
  • -Active Mobile Money Wallets stood at 12,328,755 in 2024 indicating a reduction from the 2023 records due to the above motive.

 

Notably, the proportion of active wallets increased to 84.2% (2023: 74.8%), indicating deeper engagement with mobile money services amid ongoing digital transformation. This highlights wallets on the main players in the Zambian mobile money wallet including Airtel, MTN, Zeepay and ZAMTEL among others.

Transaction Growth and System Performance

Overall Transaction Trends

The NPS recorded a notable surge in both value and volume of processed transactions in 2024:

  • -Transaction value grew by 54.3% to ZMW 5.4 trillion, up from ZMW 3.5 trillion in 2023.
  • -Transaction volume increased by 9.4% to over 4.07 billion transactions, compared to 3.72 billion in the previous year.

 

This growth is a testament to increasing digital adoption and the effectiveness of recent reforms in the ecosystem.

The Zambia Interbank Payment and Settlement System (ZIPSS) which is the country’s Large Value Payment System, experienced a remarkable 73.5% growth in processed transactions. The expansion was primarily fueled by interbank and government payments, reflecting a shift toward more efficient, electronic settlement channels.

Retail payment channels especially mobile payments and point-of-sale (POS) transactions—continued to expand, underscoring a broader transition to digital payment methods among consumers. The Bank’s sustained awareness campaigns and stakeholder collaborations played a pivotal role in this positive trend. The mobile money payment distribution is spearheaded by a network north of 160 thousand mobile agents while Zambia boasts a total of 53,043 POS terminals deployed country wide. This has increased merchant payments at agent locations and business fronts.

Net Remittance Value

We wouldn’t perform justice to the ecosystem without highlighting the strides in the international remittance sphere. The net value of international remittances more than doubled further underscoring the sector’s dynamism.

Main Source Countries: The USA and UK accounted for 57% of inbound flows.

Main Recipient Countries: India and Tanzania received 35% of outbound remittances.

The increase to USD 300 million (depending on whose reporting) in value has been driven by an increase in terminating partners, expanded collaboration with Mobile Network Operators, new corridor availability as well as agility and innovation disruptions from fintech such as Zeepay which strives to create a financially borderless Africa.

The above strides in the ecosystem have been possible through collaboration of players and the adaptive regulators. The regulator significantly the Bank of Zambia, plays a pivotal role as the bank needs to set policies and frame works strong enough to ensure financial stability and safeguarding of customer funds while ensuring enough flexibility enabling innovative transformation from the sector players.

To ensure the resilience and efficiency of the NPS, the Bank implemented several key policy measures in 2024:

  • Extended Operating Hours: ZIPSS and the Central Securities Depository (CSD) piloted extended hours (07:00–19:30), supporting the government’s 24/7 digital economy initiative.
  • Cheque Phase-Out Roadmap: Following stakeholder consultations, a roadmap for the gradual elimination of cheques was issued.
  • Consumer Protection: New directives were introduced to prohibit unwarranted charges on electronic money services.
  • Payment Aggregation Regulation: Draft regulations for payment aggregation services were developed, with final issuance expected in 2025.
  • Crypto Asset Framework: The Bank drafted a framework for crypto assets and stablecoins, set for stakeholder review in 2025.
  • Open Finance Assessment: An open finance feasibility study produced a draft roadmap, currently under review.

These measures align with the Bank’s 2024–2027 Strategic Plan, focusing on price stability, financial inclusion, and organizational resilience.

The performance of Zambia’s National Payment Systems in 2024 reflects a significant milestone in the country’s journey toward a more inclusive, efficient, and secure digital economy. The impressive growth in transaction volumes and values, coupled with strategic policy interventions and technological enhancements, underscores commitment to fostering a resilient financial ecosystem.

Continued efforts to expand digital payment channels, protect consumer rights, and embrace innovative financial technologies position Zambia to capitalize on emerging opportunities in the regional and global financial landscape. Moving forward, sustained collaboration among stakeholders and adaptive regulatory frameworks will be critical to maintaining momentum and ensuring that the benefits of digital financial services reach all segments of society.

Scam Computer Keys Showing Swindles And Fraud

Scams and Fraud

Source: The Paypers

The rapid evolution of technology, shifting consumer behaviours, and the increasing demand for instant payments have reshaped financial transactions. As online and mobile banking and ecommerce continue to grow, so do the threats associated with fraud and scams. From credit card fraud and identity fraud to wire fraud and tax fraud, financial criminals are becoming more sophisticated, exploiting vulnerabilities in payment systems and security protocols.

Managing fraud risks has never been more complex. Several key factors contribute to the growing challenge:

  • Technology advancements – the widespread adoption of AI, GenAI, ML, biometrics, graph analytics, and blockchain is transforming the way fraud is detected and prevented. While these tools provide enhanced security, fraudsters are also leveraging cutting-edge technology to develop more sophisticated attack methods.
  • Evolving fraud patterns – fraudsters continuously refine their methods, making it difficult for businesses to keep up. From payment fraud and Ponzi schemes to investment scams and social engineering, criminals use various tactics to deceive financial institutions, merchants, and consumers. Authorised push payment (APP) fraud and instant payment fraud have become particularly concerning, as real-time transactions leave little room for intervention once fraud occurs.
  • Regulatory compliance – banks, fintechs, PSPs, and ecommerce platforms must adhere to AML, KYC, PSD3, Open Banking, and AI-related regulations, which are constantly evolving. Ensuring compliance while maintaining seamless customer experiences presents a major challenge for financial institutions operating globally.

Fraud and scam trends in fintech and ecommerce

Fraud continues to be on the rise, as fraudsters leverage GenAI and other technologies that can help them become even more dangerous and hard to spot. With 2025 unfolding, several emerging trends in finance and ecommerce fraud are becoming increasingly prevalent:

  • Deepfakes and GenAI-powered scams: deepfakes and GenAI are used as techniques to generate fake content to make scammers look like genuine people. Using a random image of a stranger, fraudsters create deepfake scam videos or even resort to scam phone calls to engage with potential victims and become more trustworthy.
  • Biometric breaches: with the increasing adoption of biometric security measures, there is a growing concern over the potential for biometric data breaches, which could lead to unauthorised access and fraud.
  • Cryptocurrency scams: scammers revert to cryptocurrency scams, using social engineering techniques to lure novices into trading or investing in cryptocurrencies.

Financial fraud affects a broad range of industries, from banking and fintech to ecommerce and digital marketplaces. Some of the most prevalent fraud types include:

  • Phishing – bad actors trick individuals into sharing personal information for seemingly legitimate reasons, usually via scam emails, while impersonating renowned companies. For instance, they might ask customers to reset their passwords or update their account information through a link provided by the scammers. This leads to a fake front page resembling the official page of the company. Scammers then steal the personal data provided by the victims, taking over their accounts and accessing sensitive information. When similar activities are carried out using phones rather than a digital medium, the process is called vishing.
  • Account takeover – fraudsters gain unauthorised access to someone else’s account, often through phishing or exploiting weak passwords, to make fraudulent transactions or steal sensitive information. Account handover is when a real user gives control over their account to a fraudster, in exchange for an amount of money, usually for older accounts.
  • Identity fraud – an individual uses stolen personal information to make unauthorised purchases, open accounts, or even apply for credit cards and other services. Fraudsters may acquire this data through phishing attacks, data breaches, or social engineering tactics. Synthetic identity fraud occurs when a bad actor uses a combination of fake and real data to create a new identity that appears to be a real person. This fraud type can impact the real person connected to the fake identity by damaging their credit history, for instance.
  • Card testing – fraudsters use stolen card information to make small, low-value transactions to test if the card is active and valid. If successful, they proceed with larger fraudulent purchases.
  • Friendly fraud (first-party misuse/chargeback fraud) – involves a legitimate customer ordering an item, receiving it in good condition, and later disputing the charge with their bank, claiming the transaction was unauthorised or the product was not received.
  • Policy abuse –  customers exploit merchants’ policies to gain unfair advantages. This can include creating multiple accounts, misusing promotions, or violating return conditions.
  • Tax fraud – individuals or businesses manipulate tax filings to evade payments, leading to significant revenue losses for governments and legal risks for financial institutions.
  • Instant payments fraud – as instant payment systems become more popular, fraudsters exploit their speed and irrevocability to bypass traditional fraud prevention measures.

Fraud prevention and detection: strategies for banks, merchants, and PSPs

To effectively combat fraud schemes, businesses must adopt a multi-layered approach to fraud prevention and detection, incorporating technology, data intelligence, and human expertise. Essential strategies include:

  • AI & ML-driven fraud detection – Advanced risk scoring and real-time transaction monitoring help identify fraudulent activities before they cause harm.
  • Risk assessment & profiling – Behavioural analytics and geolocation tracking help detect suspicious activity based on user habits and transaction patterns.
  • Biometric authentication & device intelligence – Facial recognition, fingerprint scanning, and device fingerprinting add additional layers of security, reducing the risk of account takeovers.
  • Graph analytics & behavioural analysis – These tools help uncover hidden connections between fraudulent entities, enabling proactive fraud prevention.
  • Collaboration & data sharing – Industry-wide initiatives such as fraud registries, data consortiums, and intelligence-sharing networks help detect emerging fraud patterns and prevent large-scale attacks.
Rising prices words highlighted in random texts, similar to article titles in media.

DIGITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES ADOPTION IN ZAMBIA: COULD INFLATION BE A BARRIER?

Author: Mark Chirwa

Globally, digitalization has been the most significant change in the financial sector in recent years. Banks and financial institutions are increasingly offering online services such as mobile banking, e-wallets, and digital wallets like PayPal, Alipay, and Google Pay. These technologies have streamlined payments, reduced costs, and expanded financial inclusion by providing access to underbanked populations (Tuyon,2022)

In Zambia, the fintech ecosystem has not lagged behind. Several fintech startups have emerged, focusing on services such as digital wallets, peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, and remittances. The majority of fintech services in Zambia are concentrated on the following verticals: (i) developing enabling technologies for the financial sector, (ii) digital payments and money transfer, and (iii) digital lending. There are also emerging players offering services such as savings, microinsurance and asset or wealth management. After digital payments, the second largest fintech vertical is digital lending, with 18 fintechs having fully digitised credit processes (UNCDF, 2023). These startups are often seen as a means to increase financial inclusion by providing easy-to-use digital platforms that cater to underserved populations.

Technology Adoption in Financial Services

The adoption of technology in Zambia’s financial services sector has brought about significant changes that have affected various aspects of performance, including profitability, efficiency, customer satisfaction, and financial inclusion. As the country continues its push towards digital transformation, these technological advancements are reshaping how financial services are delivered and consumed, leading to improvements across the board.

Like many emerging markets, the country has been experiencing a rapid shift toward digitalization in its financial services sector. As the country undergoes economic modernization, the adoption of technology is seen as essential to improving financial inclusion, enhancing the efficiency of financial services, and contributing to overall economic growth. Key trends such as mobile money, mobile banking, digital payment systems, fintech startups, and government-driven digital transformation initiatives are shaping the financial services landscape in Zambia (Ulmasov,2024)

Zambia’s government has recognized the critical role that digital transformation plays in economic development. This is seen in the new legislation that mandates the country’s revenue authorities to tax transactions done on mobile money as a way of widening its tax revenue base.

For some time now, Zambia’s Central bank and other line ministries and stakeholders have implemented a series of initiatives such as campaigns on going cashless and phasing out of the cheque to promoting the use of electronic payment systems, Fintechs etc., All this is aimed at modernizing the financial sector which emphasizes the integration of technology into various sectors, including banking and finance.

The adoption of digital payments has been one of the most significant trends in Zambia’s financial sector. Platforms like Mobile money and mobile banking are allowing users to make payments, transfer money, and access a variety of financial services via their phones. According to the Central Bank of Zambia (2023), mobile transactions grew by 41.8% in volume and by 52.8% in value in 2023 alone. This growth is indicative of growing consumer confidence in digital financial platforms and their willingness to adopt mobile payment solutions.

While mobile phone ownership per household is relatively high, based on the 2022 National ICT Survey report, there is still a significant portion of the population in Zambia that lacks the necessary digital literacy to fully benefit from digital financial services. This includes both the older generation and people in rural areas who may not be familiar with mobile apps or online banking. Although internet penetration is growing, internet speed and connectivity issues still pose a challenge in some parts of the country, particularly in rural and remote areas. The successful implementation of digital financial services requires reliable and fast internet access, which remains a hurdle for many in Zambia.

Challenges and Opportunities for Technology Adoption in Financial Services

While there are substantial opportunities associated with digitalization, there are also considerable challenges that need to be addressed for successful and sustainable technology integration (Parida,2021). These challenges and opportunities are crucial for shaping the future of financial services in Zambia and enabling its integration into the global digital economy. One of the most pressing challenges for technology adoption in Zambia’s financial services is the relatively low level of digital literacy among large segments of the population. While mobile phone penetration is high, a significant portion of the population, especially in rural areas, still has issues of poor or inconsistent connectivity and limited exposure to advanced digital tools like online banking, mobile payments, and digital wallets especially that most of these digital platforms and other fintech solutions require robust infrastructure, including high-speed internet and reliable mobile networks. In areas where internet service is unreliable or slow, digital financial services may struggle to meet customer needs (Ulmasov,2024).

Inflation challenges

In addition to the challenges discussed above, consumer price inflation represents a significant hurdle for the adoption of technology in Zambia’s financial services sector. Inflation, which refers to the rate at which the general level of prices for goods and services rises, can undermine the effectiveness of financial services and complicate the overall economic environment for both consumers and financial institutions. One of the primary impacts of inflation is a reduction in consumers’ purchasing power. As the prices of goods and services rise, consumers may become more cautious with their spending and saving habits. This can lead to reduced demand for financial products and services, such as loans, investments, and savings accounts, which are essential drivers for the growth of financial institutions. In Zambia, where inflation has fluctuated in recent years, the growing cost of living can make it harder for financial institutions to attract and retain customers.

 As inflation erodes disposable income, consumers may be less likely to invest in digital financial tools or services, limiting the overall adoption of technology in the sector.

However, it is important to note that inflation also presents opportunities. For instance, fintech solutions like digital wallets, mobile banking, and blockchain-based technologies could offer more cost-efficient and transparent alternatives to traditional financial services, potentially, providing consumers with better options for managing their finances in an inflationary environment. Similarly, digital platforms could be leveraged to offer real-time financial advice, budgeting tools, and inflation-indexed savings products, helping consumers navigate inflationary challenges more effectively even as they adopt digital financial services (Oziegbe,2024)

Contactless and cashless payment through qr code and mobile banking

Protecting Yourself from QR Code Scams: Tips and Best Practices

Source:

QR codes have gained widespread popularity for their convenience and efficiency in accessing information, making payments, and interacting with businesses. However, with their increased usage comes the risk of QR code scams, which can compromise your online security and personal information.

Understanding QR Code Scams:

 QR code scams refer to fraudulent activities where criminals use deceptive QR codes to exploit unsuspecting individuals. These scams can lead to financial loss, identity theft, and unauthorized access to your personal data. It’s critical to be mindful of the risks involved and take the necessary precautions to safeguard your information.

How QR Code Scams Work and Common Tactics Used?

QR code scammers employ various tactics to deceive and exploit victims. One standard method is through malware and phishing attacks. Scammers create QR codes that, when scanned, direct users to malicious websites or phishing pages designed to extract sensitive information. Another tactic involves payment redirection, where scammers replace legitimate QR codes with their own, redirecting payments to their accounts instead of the intended recipient.

Signs that a QR code may be malicious or part of a scam?

It is essential to be cautious and look out for red flags. Suspicious QR code placement, unexpected payment redirections, or personal information requests indicate a potential scam. If something feels off or seems too good to be true, it’s better to err on the side of caution and refrain from scanning the code.

Tips to protect yourself from QR code scams:

  • Verify the source before scanning a QR code. Trustworthy sources include reputable businesses, official websites, or trusted individuals. Be cautious when scanning QR codes from unfamiliar sources or unsolicited messages.
  • Use a reliable and trusted QR code scanner application on your smartphone. Stick to well-known app stores, such as Google Play Store or Apple App Store, and read reviews before downloading. Avoid downloading scanner apps from unfamiliar sources.
  • Visually examine it for any signs of fiddling or manipulation. Scammers may place stickers or overlays on genuine QR codes to redirect you to malicious websites or initiate unauthorized transactions. Look for misalignments or irregularities in the design.
  • Be cautious when scanning QR codes that request personal details or login credentials. Legitimate organizations typically do not ask for sensitive information through QR codes. If you suspect a phishing attempt, manually enter the website URL instead of scanning the code.
  • When scanning QR codes that lead to websites or online platforms, ensure you are connected to a secure network. Public Wi-Fi networks can be vulnerable to eavesdropping and data interception. Use trusted cellular data or secure Wi-Fi networks to protect your information.
  • Keep your smartphone’s operating system, apps, and QR code scanner updated with the latest security patches. Updates often comprise bug fixes and security enhancements that protect against known vulnerabilities exploited by scammers. Enable automatic updates whenever possible.
  • Stay informed about common QR code scams and techniques used by attackers. Awareness is key to identifying and avoiding potential threats.
  • When using a QR code scanning app, review the permissions it requests. Be cautious if an app asks for excessive permissions that seem unrelated to scanning QR codes.
  • Scanning QR codes that promise freebies or prizes, especially from unsolicited messages or emails, can lead to scams or phishing attempts. Exercise caution and verify the legitimacy before scanning.

How to Report QR Code Scams and Seek Help?

Take immediate action if you come across a suspicious QR code or believe you have fallen victim to a QR code scam. Report the incident to relevant authorities or consumer protection agencies in your country. Additionally, reach out to your financial institution or credit monitoring services to minimize potential damage and seek assistance in resolving any issues.

Here are some best practices to further protect yourself from QR code scams:

  • Use Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Enable two-factor authentication whenever possible, especially for financial transactions or accessing sensitive information. It adds a layer of security by mandating you to provide a secondary verification method, such as a fingerprint, facial recognition, or a unique code sent to your mobile device.
  • Be Skeptical of Unsolicited QR Codes: Exercise caution when encountering QR codes sent to you unexpectedly, especially if they come from unknown sources. Scammers may use unsolicited QR codes to lure you into fraudulent schemes. Think twice before scanning a QR code you weren’t expecting or haven’t verified.
  • Employ Mobile Security Solutions: Install a reputable mobile security solution on your smartphone. Anti-malware and anti-phishing applications can help detect and prevent QR code scams and provide additional layers of protection against other types of cyber threats.
  • Double-Check URLs: When a QR code leads you to a website, double-check the URL to ensure it matches the legitimate website you intended to visit. Scammers may create deceptive URLs that closely resemble legitimate ones to trick users. Look for subtle variations or misspellings that may indicate a fraudulent website.
  • Read Permissions and Privacy Policies: When installing a QR code scanner app or any other mobile application, carefully review the permissions it requests. Be cautious of apps that request excessive authorizations, such as accessing your contacts, messages, or other personal information. Additionally, read and understand the app’s privacy policy to comprehend how your data will be managed.
  • Trust Your Intuitions: If something feels off or suspicious about a QR code or the situation in which it is presented, trust your instincts and refrain from scanning it. Your intuition can often alert you to potential scams before they transpire.

Scrutinize potential trends and emerging technologies:

 As technology evolves, so do the measures to enhance QR code security. Stay informed about future trends and emerging technologies that aim to improve the authenticity and security of QR codes. Advancements such as blockchain integration or biometrics may provide additional layers of protection in the future.

QR codes have evolved into a crucial element of our daily lives, but it’s crucial to be aware of the risks associated with QR code scams. Remember, a cautious approach and informed decision-making are key to safely leveraging QR codes’ benefits while keeping your personal information secure.

One shocked black woman worried about credit card debt

Why Scams Still Work: The Evolution of Fraud Tactics in the Digital Age

Source:

The Evolution of Fraud Tactics in the Digital Age

The rising tide of online fraud

The 2024 Global eCommerce Payments & Fraud Report reveals a troubling, yet unsurprising trend – fraud is on the rise globally. The data, collected from hundreds of merchants around the globe, shows that they faced a greater variety of fraud attacks in 2023 than in any other year. Most commonly, merchants encounter three to four different types of fraud every year, including refund/policy abuse, first-party misuse, account takeover, loyalty fraud, and triangulation schemes.

Key insights

  • Refund/policy abuse impacted 48% of merchants in 2023.
  • First-party misuse affected nearly 45% of merchants.
  • Account takeover is increasing in prevalence with a significant impact.
  • Loyalty fraud and triangulation schemes are steadily emerging as major concerns.

These numbers indicate a growing challenge for merchants worldwide, emphasising the need for fraud prevention and management strategies that tackle fraud head-on and stay one step ahead of the perpetrators.

After all this time, why do people still fall victim to scams?

One would be hard-pressed to find a merchant or consumer who has not been affected by fraud or scams, in one way or another. While we are increasingly aware of the ubiquitous phenomenon, many of us still find ourselves or those around us falling victim to online scams.

There are several reasons for this persistent issue:

  1. Increasingly sophisticated scams. While we know that scams are out there and may think we know what to look for, fraudsters continually refine their tactics, making scams harder for consumers and merchants alike to detect. Phishing schemes, for instance, have become more convincing, mimicking legitimate communications from trusted entities to a frightening degree.
  2. Emotional manipulation. Scammers prey on emotions such as fear, urgency, and desperation. Creating a sense of urgency or fear prompts victims to act quickly, without fully considering the request’s legitimacy. Mimicking a merchant to request a customer share a one-time passcode to complete a transaction is a common method of initiating an account takeover, playing on the perceived legitimacy of the request in the face of their pending transaction.
  3. Lack of awareness. While many merchants know about common scams, new fraud tactics can catch people off guard. Continuous education and awareness are essential in combating this issue. However, the perpetrators behind these tactics know that every new trick they pull from their sleeves will soon be widely recognised and less effective. One example of this evolution that both merchants and customers must contend with today is the nefarious use of artificial intelligence (AI) to generate proof-of-identity images, videos, or voice samples. We can expect this trend to grow as generative AI continues to exponentially improve each day.
  4. Technological vulnerabilities. As technology evolves, so do the methods used by fraudsters. Vulnerabilities in modern technologies can be exploited before adequate security measures are put in place. Furthermore, when those solutions are deployed, fraudsters immediately set to work, engineering creative ways to bypass, override, or otherwise render those solutions ineffective.
  5. Process vulnerabilities. Fraud protection starts with the merchant’s processes. Weak verification steps, overly lenient refund policies, and outdated fraud detection methods are open invitations for fraudsters to strike. According to MRC’s 2024 report, up to 40% of merchants identified gaps in fraud tool capabilities as a significant challenge. Strengthening internal processes, tightening refund policies, and ensuring consistent staff training can close these gaps. Just as fraudsters use AI in their methods of attack, merchants can also leverage advanced AI-driven fraud detection tools to add an essential layer of defence against crafty fraud schemes.

The financial impact of fraud

According to the same MRC report, merchants estimate that fraud schemes drain roughly 3% of their total ecommerce revenue annually. This figure highlights the substantial economic burden that fraud places on businesses, which can amount to millions of dollars in lost profits. The repercussions of fraud affect everyone, from the CEO and suppliers to employees and consumers.

Financial impact by region:

  • North America: Merchants report a fraud rate of 3.3% of total revenue.
  • Europe and APAC: Slightly higher rates, around 3.5%.
  • SMBs: Small and mid-sized businesses experience higher fraud rates compared to larger enterprises.

Strategies for combating fraud

Unfortunately, fraud is here to stay. Wherever money changes hands, a malicious entrepreneurial fraudster will lurk, waiting for the opportunity to pounce. The good news is that there are several ways merchants can protect themselves and their customers from this ever-present threat.

  1. Enhanced verification processes. Implementing stronger verification processes can help prevent fraud at various stages of the transaction. This includes using multi-factor authentication (MFA) and biometric verification.
  2. Advanced fraud detection tools. Leveraging AI and machine learning (ML) can enhance fraud detection capabilities. These tools can analyse patterns and detect anomalies in real time, providing an additional layer of security.
  3. Educating employees and customers. Regular employee training sessions about fraud KPIs and security protocols can reduce the likelihood of merchants falling victim to sophisticated fraud schemes. For example, frequent reviews and updated training on protective policies like return windows — and how to enforce those parameters with customers — can help stem fraud at the front line. Merchants can also shape these proactive measures into consumer awareness programmes. Moreover, reminding customers never to share their passwords, account information, or other common scams like gift card purchases alerts them to be mindful of these tactics during all transactions.
  4. Collaboration with industry partners. Working with industry partners and participating in forums, such as those provided by the MRC, can help merchants stay informed about the latest trends and best practices in fraud prevention.

The road ahead

As we look towards 2024 and beyond, the fight against online fraud remains a top priority for the ecommerce industry. The data from the Merchant Risk Council’s 2024 report underscores the need for ongoing vigilance, advanced security measures, and robust fraud management strategies. By understanding the numbers and recognising why people still fall victim to scams, merchants can better prepare and protect their businesses in an increasingly digital world.

While the battle against online fraud is far from over, staying informed and proactive can make a vital difference for the safety of merchants and consumers alike. With the right tools, education, and collaboration, we can strengthen our defense against the ever-evolving threat of online fraud.

Bank card with fingerprint tech concept glowing lines, 3d rendering. Computer digital drawing.

CAN ZAMBIA EVER ACHIEVE A UNIFIED KYC?

Author:

Lombe Chibesakunda

A unified KYC is a database linking infor­mation on each unique individual within that country’s ecosystem. KYC (Know Your Customer Compliance) is one of the most important essential requirements for fi­nancial institutions when determining the validity of transactions. In Zambia the re­quirement forces institutions to report all transactions above a certain threshold and often requires account holders to provide sufficient information to prevent identity fraud, money laundering and track per­petrators of such crimes. This process is considered flawed with significant gaps in information preventing effective enforce­ment of the laws. While companies abide by regulation mandating information col­lection, the data is often inconsistent or in­accessible to the relevant authorities; this is often due to the data being physically stored, with each company having silos of unique information about each consumer.

The objective of a unified KYC is to digitise and unify this data to allow the relevant authorities to discover patterns of fraudu­lent activity and identify the perpetrators of this behaviour. Recently with an up­ take in cyber-crimes in Zambia, the trend among the attacks on the industry implies the orchestrators of such attacks are tak­ing advantage of the lack of information sharing in the industry to commit fraud­ulent transactions. The first successfully executed unified KYC system was estab­lished in Estonia in 1992 and is largely at­tributed with halting cyber-crime. To date 98% of Estonians have a ‘National ID Card’ which has been used for digital signatures nearly 1 billion times.

Benefits of Unified KYC

Despite consistencies in the KYC require­ments between various companies and sectors, information is largely considered difficult to determine. This perpetually leaves our industries exposed to similar at­tacks across different networks. It is esti­mated the economy is losing a substantial amount of money to fraudulent transac­tions. Therefore, the first potential benefit of this system is security. A unified digi­tal identity provides more accountability and traceability for perpetrators of serious crimes. Biometric systems, for example, verify the identity of the transactor un­equivocally before commencing using face scanning software. Hypothetically a unified KYC could also enable fintechs to have access to more enhanced data on clients before entering the market. This in turn would allow for more ‘open banking’, a popular notion that users should be able to access their bank accounts from various providers. Such initiatives will likely have a positive impact on financial inclusion and make the market more attractive.

Issues to be Faced in Implementation

Currently there is a potential issue of serv­er localisation. Due to some specific pro­visions in the Data Protection Act (2021) and the Cyber Crimes Act (2020) there is increasing pressure on banks to localise the servers on which they store client data. The purpose of this is to increase govern­ment access to user data in case of safety issues. It will also allow for more cooper­ation, specifically the establishments of a unified database. When implemented in Kenya, the majority of banks were not immediately able to fulfill this require­ment without additional investment. Due to the international ownership of several key stakeholders, such an investment de­manded at least 1 year to be approved and allowing local banks to fall behind microfi­nances and FinTech’s like Mpesa.

In South Africa the banks were able to prevent the unification of centralised da­tabases. This has kept KYC largely within their control and institutions enhanced their offerings to include more expansive data collection to fill this gap. However, a bank led transition has so far only worked in countries where the majority of adults have bank accounts. According to the lat­est data from the Bank of Zambia, only 15% of the country has access to a formal bank account. By comparison, the MNO’s have captured 90% of the market withheld by a limit stated by the Bank of Zambia re­stricting holdings to K20,000 per account. In Namibia the regulator faced similar is­sues and resorted to forcing the banks to comply with the AML/CFT/CPF regulations (referring to the FIA’s Anti Money Launder­ing Service rules). In Rwanda the regulator completed the same actions and in Ni­geria the Central Bank forced the imple­mentation of a three-tiered system. This does not come without significant costs however, according to a KPMG report 71% of Nigerian banks stated KYC is the most significant cost on their business. It is es­timated each bank spends between N50 – N400 million in investment, despite this FinTech’s such as OPay have surpassed the largest Nigerian banks in market value.

Challenges within the Zambian Market?

The Indian application of the national uni­fied provides both a promising and cau­tionary tale when implementing a unified KYC. In 2009 there was no notable method of national identity in the country but fol­lowing the introduction to India’s Aadhaar system more than 1.2 billion citizens have digital registration which tracks all pay­ments, health data and accounts across the country. In Ghana, since the introduction of the national identity system (the Ghana Card) more than 70% of child births are now registered (in Zambia less than 10% of the population has birth certificates by com­parison). With a digital identity more users are able to access financing and be able to be served at hospitals with more pre­cise medical records. Rwanda is deemed to have the most complex identity regis­try in Africa, using a biometric system.

The implementation of the system helped reduce the average clearing time at the Kivu border with Congo (45,000 people passing per day) from 4-5 hours to 30 seconds. This system has been attributed with vastly reduced the cost of accessing credit scoring information and has re­duced the interest rates charged to fully KYC’ed consumers in the country. The challenges the Indian government had in implementing the Aadhar system were largely due to large financial institu­tions which refused to allow the system access to customer accounts. This issue is similar to that faced in Nigeria, Namibia and Rwanda. In order to have successfully implemented such a system they needed the Aadhaar Act to be ratified to force co­operation.

In 2019 it was deemed by the Indian su­preme court that such a system could not demand that each user attach their bank account but the system itself was legal and was beneficial to the Indian people. Despite the substantial benefits the peo­ple of India gained from the introduction of a digitized national identity system, there are still glaring issues which serve as a stark warning in the case of a rushed im­plementation. It has been reported that you can purchase an individual’s identity for less than $100, with large databases a golden opportunity for hackers. As part of the case against the Government, it was proved that once on the database the government was unable to verify millions of individuals’ fraudulent information.

Conclusion

There is no easy path to the conversation of digitised KYC but there is also no avoid­ing it. The majority of medium income developing countries are either in the pro­cess or have completed citizen digitiza­tion and we therefore risk falling behind. However, this does not mean there is only one specific approach, each country fac­es challenges when implementing these systems based on the structure of the fi­nancial institutions. It will be important to understand the readiness of the biggest players in the economy with consideration of the benefits to the general population.

6ce69853-cc88-4e98-9550-869105fa0c5f

MIGRATION INFORMING REMITTANCE IN AFRICA

Author:

Aston Njovu, Regional Product Manager (SADC) – Zeepay

International remittance has continued to remain significant on the African continent. Senders remit funds back home for various purposes including food, health, education and family support during tough times. For many, sending money home assures a sense of belonging as they feel closer to family.

There has been an increase in migration stock from and within the African continent post the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly stemming from the economic constrains experienced in several countries. History has proven that, increase in migration results in the increase in remittance as migrants send money back home. Currently 40.4 million Africans have migrated, among which 20.7 million have migrated intra-Africa. This indicates an increase of 2.6% CAGR in five years. We will further experience increased intra-Africa migration as the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) is actualized in several countries. 

In most cases an individual will migrate and settle in a host country and invite family as well as friends to settle join. The largest source countries for migrants are Egypt, Morocco, South Sudan, Somalia, Nigeria, Cameroon, Eritrea and the Gambia. With the largest host country being France with an estimated 4.3 million African migrants while on a continental front, Europe hosts 11 million Africans, Asia 4.8 million, and North America with 3.3 million. On an intra-Africa scope, there has historically been a strong movement towards South Africa, while Ivory Coast has the largest number of African migrants with UNDESA recording 2.5 million. The largest country of origin on the continent being South Sudan with 2.5 million emigrants mainly to Uganda, Sudan, Ethiopia, Kenya and the DRC.

Informed by the migration stock, Africans in the diaspora continue to increase the value of money sent back home as they support family, and friends cope with the economic turbulences. Remittance value has grossed USD 100.1 billion in Africa. This is more than the Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) and twice the Official Development assistance (ODA) received on the continent.

Remittance flows are a major contributor to the GDP of several countries hence the economic significance.   This refers to countries like The Gambia, Comoros, Lesotho, Cape Verde and Guinea Bissau, where remittances represent more than 10 percent of GDP.

It is interesting to note that, 65 percent of the total remittance flow was directed to Egypt, Nigeria and Morocco in 2022. With the major send countries being the United States, Italy, France, United Kingdom and Canada. Intra-Africa remittances have further continued to surge with the top 5 largest corridors in being Cameroon – Nigeria 1.3 billion, Niger – Nigeria 1.2 billion, South Africa – Zimbabwe 957 million, Nigeria – Ghana 809 million and Benin – Nigeria 696 million. 

While the above remittance performance is exciting, I am quick to mention that sending money in Africa is still very expensive. Some countries and regions have fees as high as 11 percent. Therefore, have a long way to go in achieving Goal 10. of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, which aims at dropping the remittance fee to 3 percent by 2030.

Digital financial institutions such as Zeepay are leveraging international remittances to disrupt the mobile money ecosystem. Zeepay prides itself as an enabler in reducing remittance fees, breaking financial borders while increasing financial inclusion in Africa from the current 51 percent.

The future of remittance and payments is an interesting one, as several factors are taken into consideration to drive growth as well as sustainability. Among these are, infrastructure and technological investments, proliferation in mobile wallet use cases, convenient cross border payments as well as collaboration among players in the Digital Financial Ecosystem. 

I am excited to see how the next two years will unfold!

Source: RemitSCOPE Africa, World bank

Payz Mag pic 1

WHY ARE DFS IMPORTANT FOR WOMEN

Source:

FSD Zambia

According to the FinScope (2020) Survey findings, the increase or growth in the Zambian financial inclusion is mainly attributed to increased uptake of mobile money which registered an increase from 14% in 2015 to 58.5% by 2020. Financial Products or services means a product or service related to finance, including banking, securities, consumer credit, or money transmission. By enabling poor households to use products and services of formal financial institutions to optimally maintain accounts, they will have better access to financial products such as:

  •    – Payments
  •    – Savings
  •    – Credit
  •    – Risk Management tools such as insurance

 

A critical look at the factors of financial inclusion reveals why each of them is necessary

Payments

Financial inclusion starts with payments. They serve as a gateway to other financial services. Mobile money payments in Zambia have grown to an annual average of 126% in value, from K2.07 billion in 2015 to K452.0 billion in 2023. To improve financial inclusion, these transaction accounts need to enable end users to meet most, if not all, of their payment needs and to safely store some value.

Savings

Savings are also an important aspect of financial inclusion. The emergence of mobile money banking services has been seen as a blessing to many low-income earners in Zambia.

Luke Bwalya is a 27-year-old informal trader in Lusaka, the Zambian capital, who has never opened an account with any bank since he started his business of selling various merchandise. According to him, banks are for people with a lot of money. Savings are important for smoothing out peaks and troughs in income and expenditure.  The poor do save using mainly informal sector financial services and that savings have an impact on poor people in three key areas being;

(1)         Wealth accumulation to finance a household’s long-term goals

(2)         Insurance against illness, death and sudden income losses and other contingencies;

(3)         Safeguard against uneven income streams due to seasonal variations

              (savings of high-income periods are used to finance consumption expenditures during low-                     income periods); and

(4)         Savings for future investments in education for children and other human resource                                    development investments. Mobile money electronic accounts offer the safe storage of cash,                  though without the payment of interest. Savings on a mobile money platform has been made                  much easier as mobile money agents are found.

Credit

Improving credit access in Zambia is key to not only increasing formal financial inclusion but also to growing and developing Zambia’s ever-changing economy. Access to credit for Zambian household enables poor people have assets they need to transform to economic empowerment, access capital for SMEs and help pay school fees.  However, credit should be well regulated otherwise the burden of it can render it useless. Zambians are using SGs to access credit and this has shown that closer user SGs experience more trust that microfine.

Digital credit has become quite popular for women and all other customers on mobile money platforms. From the credit exposure algorithms determined over data on mobile money, a service provider can advance a determined amount to a user. This is faster access to credit and goes a long way to supporting women businesses.

Insurance

Insurance is one of four pillars of financial inclusion. Insurance products can make a significant positive difference in the lives of vulnerable individuals by helping households mitigate shocks and improve the management of expenses related to unforeseen events such as medical emergencies, a death in the family, theft or natural disasters. However, there is a persistent insurance gap, particularly in developing countries. Insurance is one of the least used financial services, meaning low-income households and individuals are needlessly vulnerable to risk and financial shocks.

Zambia is no exception; current insurance penetration is very low, aside from mandatory insurance such as motor vehicle cover, still skewed towards high-income population segments. Inclusive insurance is recognized as a valuable means to stabilize and even improve income for individuals, households, and businesses. It can be used alongside credit, savings, and transfers to mitigate and financially relieve the potential financial losses faced by middle or low-income individuals and micro, small and medium sized enterprises (MSMEs). These include health, disability, and accident-related risks, or the death of a family member. Insurance can also protect assets including houses, livestock, or vehicles, against the repercussions of theft, fire, death, loss, or the impacts of natural disaster and climate change. It is widely recognized that, over time, inclusive insurance can improve welfare. It builds financial resilience, cushioning individuals, households, businesses, and communities from economic shocks, preventing them from falling into poverty or becoming poorer.

 

All the above financial products give women basic tools they need to prosper in the economy. Without them, women can struggle to start businesses, save to match earnings to their cost payments over time, invest in the future, and provide for their families. Closing the gender gap in DFI will have positive effects.

Having better access to and use of a range of financial services also contributes to women’s autonomy, allowing for better use of their personal and household resources, and reducing the vulnerability of their households and businesses.  In a nutshell, increasing financial inclusion for women can act as an enabler of countries’ development, economic growth, inequality reduction, business evolution, and social inclusion.

How to grow women’s access for financial services in Zambia

The plan to achieve greater women’s financial inclusion is dependent upon the creation of a more gender inclusive financial system that addresses the specific demand and supply barriers faced by women, supported by an inclusive regulatory environment.

Factors necessary for the achievement of full digitized financial inclusion

Access to financial services is a prerequisite for uptake and usage of services. There are various reasons for the lower uptake of financial services by women. The three most important ones are access to cell phones, digital financial literacy, and KYC rules.

According to a wide range of research available, including FinScope 2020 and the ZICTA Survey 2018, many women do not have mobile devices that can enable them to access DFS. Data shows that about 40% of women do not have cell phone access.  FSD Zambia’s recent work to distribute cell phones and solar mini chargers to women found that they were extremely enthusiastic and empowered to expand mobile money services and knowledge.

Low levels of financial literacy among women discourage even owners of mobile phones to utilise them for different types of transactions. In some countries of the sub-Sahara, deliberate programs have been designed to send young people into communities to teach women and older citizens how to operate a mobile hand device. 

FSD Zambia undertook a pilot community radio programme for digital financial education called Bank Yako in Eastern Province and showed significant results, particularly for women.

Many women do not have the formal identification documents to meet the requirements for Know Your Customer (KYC). This becomes a problem as women begin to move from informal financial services to formal ones. Most women will not remember where their one acquired paper-based National Registration Card (NCR) identity card is stored. Implementation of an electronic/biometric identity system is a good solution for this complication, and development of the approach is well under way in Zambia.

Once these barriers of cell phone access, digital literacy, and identity are addressed, the issue of the right financial product to attract women becomes more immediate. Many financial services providers do not work out client-centric product development when it comes to serving women. Since their products and services are only superficially tailored to meet men’s needs, most women remain un-served as they do not find reasons justifying use of existing financial services. Service providers must avoid gender-neutral approaches, adopt gender segmentation during research and product design, and articulate a clear business case for reaching underserved women.